Got an idea?
Find your first step.

Describe a project in one sentence and get a plain-English read on what it is, what approval it needs, and who to talk to — before you fill in a single form.

audit · or · research? do I need ethics? who do I ask?
01

Tell us the idea

Audit whether we follow the VTE prophylaxis guideline Survey patients on their discharge experience Test if a new early-warning score predicts deterioration Review old charts to find risk factors for delirium
Reading your idea and checking it against the framework…

Ethics (REC) review

Governance (RGMS)

Your first steps

    Who to talk to

    The Research Directorate office

    02

    Two things people get wrong

    These two mix-ups are behind a large share of applications that come back for correction. Thirty seconds here saves a fortnight later.

    Most common data error

    "Anonymised" ≠ "pseudonymised"

    "I swapped the names for study numbers, so the data is anonymised." — Usually not true.

    Anonymised

    No one can link it back to a person, by any means reasonably likely. No key exists. Falls outside GDPR — but genuinely hard to achieve.

    Pseudonymised

    Identifiers replaced with a code, but a key still links back. This is still personal data — full GDPR and Health Research Regulations 2018 apply.

    The test: if you (or anyone) hold a key that re-links the data, it is pseudonymised, not anonymised — and it is regulated. A spreadsheet of study numbers with a separate "code → name" list is pseudonymised.

    Why this matters for your application

    Calling pseudonymised data "anonymised" changes which legal basis, consent route, and safeguards apply. Reviewers have to send it back to be corrected. Under the Irish Health Research Regulations 2018, the act of anonymising is itself processing, and explicit consent or a Health Research Consent Declaration may be in play.

    Open full guidance — HRCDC →

    Most common scope error

    Audit ≠ research ≠ service evaluation

    "It's just an audit, so I don't need ethics." — Sometimes right, sometimes the project is actually research.

    Audit / Service evaluation / QI

    Measures current practice against a standard, or judges a service, to improve local care. Generally no REC — but still covered by GDPR and may need local sign-off.

    Research

    Aims to create new, generalisable knowledge — a hypothesis, randomisation, deviating from usual care, or sharing beyond local use. Needs REC ethics approval + RGMS governance (per site).

    The deciding question: are you measuring against an agreed standard to fix things locally (audit), or trying to discover something new that others could generalise from (research)? The line can be fine — when unsure, ask us before you start.

    The official source

    The HSE National Centre for Clinical Audit publishes a Nomenclature glossary (2025) with clear definitions. Crucially, it is the project lead's responsibility to decide — the REC does not issue "waivers," and an out-of-scope project may still need local governance.

    Open full guidance — HSE Research →
    03

    Where to go next

    Ready to take it further?

    The Research Directorate is your single point of entry — from a small student audit to a full multi-centre study. Everything below is on the Directorate's site.

    Get started I've got an idea — show me the first steps
    Rather talk to a person? info@medicalresearch.ie · 061 483655